• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Publications
  • Podcast

Commentary & Cuentos

Thoughts on Race, Politics, and Pop Culture

September 3, 2020

George Lopez, the Trauma of Generations, and Generational Trauma

September 3, 2020

You might have missed it, given the state of the nation and world, but George Lopez released a stand-up special at the end of June on Netflix. “We’ll Do it for Half,” the title of the special is an allusion to a controversy that Lopez was involved in, a joking tweet about a rumored bounty on Trump issued by Iran.

Lopez continues to be one of the most famous Latino actors and comedians, who has used his celebrity to weigh in on politics.  The titles of his stand-up specials alone indicate this, “America’s Mexican,” “Tall, Dark, and Chicano,” and “The Wall.” “Tall, Dark, and Chicano” in 2009 was released during Obama’s presidency, but revealed the cracks in the purported era of post-racial America.  Lopez was coming off his sitcom and was angry about the comedic, directorial, and content concessions he had to make appeal to white audiences in order to be “mainstream.”  No longer under the constraints of media whitewashing, he was a dark Chicano and he had something to say. 

Continue Reading

Posted by Aaron E. Sanchez Leave a Comment
Filed Under: Fatherhood, Popular Culture, Race

February 12, 2019

Latest for Sojourners: This is the Face of the Reconquista

February 12, 2019

I’ve had the opportunity to write for Sojourners lately. I’ll be posting the articles I’ve written for them over the next weeks.

Demographically, socially, and culturally, the reconquista (re-conquest) of the Southwest United States by Mexican immigrants is well underway.

– Samuel P. Huntington

The first cast in the ochre light of the dawning sun is a morning prayer, filled with hope and faith that ceremonies sought in earnest will feed the soul. I reel dutifully, waiting for a faint tap on the end of my line. My father stands at the front of the boat, scanning for ripples on the water in the low light. “Wachale!” he exclaims in joking Spanglish as he reels in the first largemouth of the day. Two Mexican-Americans bass fishing in Texas. This is the face of the Reconquista.

Continue Reading

Posted by Aaron E. Sanchez Leave a Comment
Filed Under: Faith, Fatherhood, History, Immigration, Popular Culture, Race

April 2, 2018

The Point of the New Citizenship Question on the Census is to Make the Nation Whiter by Fiat

April 2, 2018

Last month, the Trump administration made it clear that the 2020 census would include a question regarding citizenship.  The administration claimed that the new citizenship question was added to make sure that key sections of the Voting Rights Act were being upheld.  The block-by-block census data could identify communities under threat and the Justice Department, headed by Jeff Sessions, could keep an eye on those vulnerable communities.  The administration argued that it was nothing for community or civil rights organizations to worry about.

The census is constitutionally mandated in order to ascertain the number of people living in the country.  Using that information, representation can be apportioned, congressional districts can be drawn, federal funding can be issued, states can make long-term plans.  But the census is important because it one of the ways that the state “sees.”  That is, government officials at local, state, and national levels do not personally know every single constituent or person living in their district, city, state, or country.  It is impossible for them to know something or anything about everybody, yet these officials must.  In order for highly organized states to function, they must know key aspects about the populations they encompass. The census, a series of questions asking individuals to describe themselves and their families, is one of the many ways governments know their populations (others include social security numbers, driver’s licenses, birth certificates, death certificates, tax returns, etc.).

Continue Reading

Posted by Aaron E. Sanchez Leave a Comment
Filed Under: Politics, Race, Republicans

September 28, 2017

It’s Donald Trump’s Republican Party Now

September 28, 2017

With so much in the headlines recently, it would have been easy to pass over a significant development in the Republican Party.  On September 17, 2017, the New York Times released a confidential memo from the Senate Leadership Fund to Republican donors explaining the implications of the Alabama Senate special election.  In it, the establishment wing of the GOP, including Mitch McConnell and his allies, concede that the Republican Party is Trump’s now.

The Senate Leadership Fund explains that the neoliberal branch of the GOP had been able to hold off the angry insurgent nationalist wing of the party in 2010 and 2014.  “However, this year’s Alabama Senate special election shows that the 2014-16 playbook for winning Republican primaries needs to be recalibrated and improved….[The] electorate has dramatically realigned itself with President Trump at the helm,” states the memo.

Continue Reading

Posted by Aaron E. Sanchez Leave a Comment
Filed Under: Conservatism, Politics, Race, Republicans

June 12, 2017

Loving v Virginia and its Legacy for Latinos: Interracial Marriage Fifty Years Later

June 12, 2017

I was born too late in a land that no longer belongs to me….They belong to a pilgrim who arrived here only yesterday whose racist tongue says to me: I hate Meskins.  You’re a Meskin. Why don’t you go back to where you came from?…I was born too late or perhaps I was born to soon: It is not yet my time: this is not yet my home.  I must wait for the conquering barbarian to learn the Spanish world for love.

In 1975, Chicana poet Angela De Hoyos wrote these words, asking herself in the midst of the Chicana/o Movement and Civil Rights Movement about her place in time.  Was she born too late or was she born too soon?  In her hometown of San Antonio, Texas, home to Spanish missions founded in the 18th century, most famously the Alamo, she didn’t feel at home.  In fact, she was told that she was not home, that she needed to return, to go back to where she had come from.  Lost between time and space, she hoped and ached for a moment when displacement and discord might be mitigated by the bonds of affection.  De Hoyos was left waiting for the day that code-switching could transform conquerors and conquered, leaving only words of love.

Is today that day?

Seemingly.  June 12, 2017 marks the 50th anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court case that found antimiscegenation laws unconstitutional.

Continue Reading

Posted by Aaron E. Sanchez Leave a Comment
Filed Under: History, Politics, Race Tagged: Race

An intellectual historian bringing context and perspective to contemporary issues.

Search

Subscribe Via Email

Topics

  • 2016 Presidential Race
  • Chicano Studies
  • Conservatism
  • Democrats
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Faith
  • Fatherhood
  • History
  • Immigration
  • Politics
  • Popular Culture
  • Race
  • Republicans
  • Uncategorized

Look Around

  • About
  • Contact
  • Twitter

Popular Posts

An Elegy for Juan Gabriel
The Republicans’ Latino Problem
In American Politics, Se Habla Español

Theme by 17th Avenue · Powered by WordPress & Genesis